Rah! and Blah!
August 13th 2007 11:56
The Rundown on the absolutely awesome and the absolutely not.
BLAH!
Striving for mediocrity and succeeding every time.
When Emerica were brainstorming how they'd sell their latest shoes, they knew from the start that they wanted to use a cardboard cutout of a hairy thirty year old stoner who lives at home with his mum and wears dumb hats, while standing around holding a shoe. Why does he hold the shoe? Is he high? Is he making a statement? Is he protecting it from the elements? Do we care?
Yes, yes. Violence is chic. We get it. Which is easy, considering the image is about as subtle as a pitchfork to the head.
Is anyone this happy when they shop? Why does she have colourful paper bags instead of drab white plastic. Why do we all curl up to this lie and act like being a consumer is anything but psuedo-existence?
That's right kids. For only $149 you too could have a pair of sunglasses, based on a design prevalent in Op Shops, that complements an unsightly mullet and a passe 'rebel without cause' shtick.
RAH!
Bringing S-E-X-X-Y back
Heroin addicts are always thinking of their next hit. They publish generic children's books to fund their habit, and this is the result.
Random people drawn on buses is cool. Just because.
| 57 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog


























Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
Comment by Brenton
Dr Spin
Tales From The Other Side
Downwrite
Blip Blog
Gadget Museum
Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
I actually only read up to the second one before posting that so yeah
Comment by Chic Critique
*giggle*
Cheers
CC
Comment by Damo
For the Sake of Argument
My Apologetics
hahahaha.
Comment by Brenton
Dr Spin
Tales From The Other Side
Downwrite
Blip Blog
Gadget Museum
Damo - is it a sad indightment on me that that was my first thought?